Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 22, 2011PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

The defendant filed an application in the county court under G. L. c. 278, § 33E, for leave to appeal from the denial of his second motion for a new trial. A single justice reserved and reported the case to the full court on the question whether a so-called Acevedo error in the jury instructions on the burden of proof on provocation presents a “new and substantial” question under the statute, Commonwealth v. Acevedo, 427 Mass. 714, 717 (1998) (Acevedo), and if it does, whether the error created a substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice. See Commonwealth v. Randolph, 438 Mass. 290,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. TorresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. AcevedoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. AmbersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  5. Mains v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GonzalezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. VillalobosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. AlbertMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2026
  4. Commonwealth v. ButlerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. ButlerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API