Legal Opinion

Aetna Life Ins. v. Putnam

District Court, D. Maine

Decided January 17, 1950No. Civ. No. 597Published

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, District Judge.

This is a bill of interpleader by the plaintiff corporation, the Aetna Life Insurance Company, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, brought under the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C., Sec. 1335, against defendant claimants, Anna Louise Putnam of Brunswick, Maine, and Lawrence Robert Pearson of Chicago, Illinois. The purpose of the bill is to determine which of the within named claimants is entitled to the proceeds of the company’s life insurance policy, numbered N-l, 111, 627, issued on December 19, 1935, to Robert B. Pearson. In this policy plaintiff promised to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doering v. BuechlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  2. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. CorodemosDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1934
  3. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API