Pipes v. Hardesty

This case comes up upon a bill of exceptions to the admis- • sion of a deed in evidence, without a material interlineation on the face of the deed being accounted for.

In the bill of exceptions, it is stated, “ the court, however, being of a different opinion, permitted the document to go in evidence.”

From this, together with the certificate of the clerk, of the deed being offered in connection with certain depositions, we may infer that the court considered that the testimony offered with the deed, accounted for the interlineation; and we cannot say that the court erred. The deed in question…