Legal Opinion

Slingerland v. East Jersey Water Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On rule to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

*412The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beasley, Chief • Justice.

This verdict cannot stand.

The gravamen of the action was this: The father of the plaintiff, Aletha B. Slingerland, was the owner of a certain farm which it was necessary to use for the purpose of laying pipes to supply the city of Newark with water. The city had contracted with the defendant, the East Jersey Water Company, to do this work as a part of the system that had been adopted, who sub-contracted with one Gillespie to do the work. Inasmuch as the father of the plaintiff refused to sell the necessary right of way for the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Slingerland v. GillespieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  2. Slingerland v. GillespieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
  3. Slingerland v. GillespieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API