Legal Opinion
Schaefer v. Pierce
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 6, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), dated August 26, 1992, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
The unsworn letter reports of the examining physician and chiropractor relied upon by the plaintiff in opposing the defendants’ motion were insufficient to raise triable issues of fact (see also, Pagano v Kingsbury, 182 AD2d 268; Tatti v…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pagano v. KingsburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Georgia v. RamautarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Traugott v. KonigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Dubois v. SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Tatti v. CummingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Krakofsky v. Fox-RizziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Damas v. ValdesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Joseph v. FormanNew York Supreme Court · 2007