Legal Opinion

Socci v. Pasiak

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 21, 2012No. AC 32778PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SHELDON, J.

The defendant, Jeffrey Pasiak, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to set aside the verdict of a jury awarding $835,700 in *565damages to the plaintiff Sara Socci1 for injuries and losses she claimed to have suffered due to his tortious conduct toward her during an incident at his home office on May 9,2006. The plaintiff claimed, more particularly, and the jury found, by its general verdict, that the defendant caused her injuries and losses in the subject incident by conduct constituting false imprisonment, negligence and/or intentional, reckless or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doe v. ManheimerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. State v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. State v. DARRYL W.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. PasiakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  2. Rendahl v. PelusoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  3. Cima v. SciarettaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  4. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. PasiakConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
  5. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. PasiakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API