Anheuser-Busch Incorporated v. The Stroh Brewery Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1DissentBright, Circuit Judge
In this case, a major beer brewer, Anheuser-Busch, invokes federal jurisdiction seeking trademark protection for its brand name “LA”. I would deny protection because its claim to the mark “LA” reflects a preemptive and anticompetitive intent to capture the emerging market for low alcoholic content beer by converting the initials of “low alcohol” (l.a.) into a trademark.
Counsel for Anheuser-Busch commented that this case is not complex. I agree. An artificial complexity arises only when pragmatic and flexible interpretations of the trademark laws become enmeshed in the rigid categorization of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Schmidt v. LessardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- James Burrough Limited and Kobrand Corporation v. Sign of the Beefeater, Inc., and Montgomery Ward & Co., IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.