Legal Opinion

Mauldin v. Patten

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 6, 1963No. 39967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

G. A. Mauldin brought suit for damages against Bob Patten, doing business as Bob Patten Construction Company, alleging the destruction of a bridge on the Old Federal Road crossing the Etowah River when Patten’s heavy road machinery crossed it, that the bridge has not been replaced and that access to his 300 acre farm by way of the Old Federal Road has been destroyed resulting in several items of damage including, inter alia, a diminution in value of $30 per acre of his farm. To the sustaining of a general demurrer he excepts. Held:

One whose means of egress from and ingress to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barham v. GrantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Coker v. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Brunswick & Western Railroad v. Hardey & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Bembe v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  5. Atkinson v. KreisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mauldin v. PattenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API