Legal Opinion

Succession of Spann

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 2, 1929No. 29947PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOverton, J.

The administrators of the succession of William R. Spann filed, in September, 1928, the final account of their administration. The administrators carried on the account, as due by the succession, the claims of Kenneth R. Phillips and Dickson & Denny. Phillips’ claim is for $4,000, alleged to be due as his portion of the proceeds of fire insurance policies on the plant of the Gulf Can Company, which was destroyed by fire. The claim of Dickson & Denny is for a balance of $3,000, alleged to be due for legal services rendered in the spring of 1924. Both of these claims are opposed by certain…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. LarnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  2. Henry Block Co. v. PapaniaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  3. In re the Succession of KuglerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871
  4. Sleet v. SleetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  5. McGinty v. Succession of HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United Carbon Company v. Mississippi River Fuel Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. Averette v. JordanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Youngblood v. DaviesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Leitz Eagan Funeral Home, Inc. v. RidgleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Succession of ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API