Legal Opinion

American Information Enterprises, Inc. v. Thornburgh

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 13, 1990No. 90 Civ. 1719 (RPP)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.

Plaintiffs move, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a), for a preliminary injunction enjoining the enforcement of that portion of the 1989 amendment to the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. §§ 223(b) and (c) (“the Helms Amendment”), which regulates the communication of “indecent” speech over the telephone. Plaintiffs, who refer to themselves as “information providers” (“IP’s”), .operate various types of commercial telephone services, which offer listeners, either exclusively or in part, a sexually explicit content.…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Information Providers' Coalition for Defense of the First Amendment v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Dial Information Services Corp. of New York v. ThornburghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  3. Gay Men's Health Crisis v. SullivanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  4. Dial Information Services Corporation Of New York v. Richard L. ThornburghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. Information Providers' Coalition for Defense of the First Amendment v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API