Legal Opinion

First Westchester National Bank v. New England Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 13, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtChrist, J.

Summary judgment was granted to respondent on the second cause of action in the amended complaint, which was for recovery upon the “ Collision or Upset” coverage in an automobile insurance policy. The pertinent facts are undisputed. The policy had been issued by appellant on August 8, 1951, for a three-year term, with respect to an automobile which was on that day bought by one Sheldon with financing furnished by respondent. Respondent bases its right to recover on the fact that it held a mortgage on the automobile at the time of the loss and that it was named as a “ Loss Payee ” in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. StinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Moore v. Hanover Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Harrison v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Marcus v. United States Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. The Buffalo Steam Engine Works v. . the Sun Mut. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Watts v. St. Katherine Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API