Legal Opinion
Sedgwick Avenue Associates v. Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 12, 1994PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Seymour Schwartz, J.), entered May 11, 1993, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and declared that defendant is not *94obligated to further defend or to indemnify plaintiffs in an underlying personal injury action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The IAS Court properly concluded that defendant insurance company was not equitably estopped from disclaiming any further defense of the underlying action or indemnification of plaintiffs. Where there is no coverage under an insurance policy because the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hartford Insurance Group v. MelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Nassau Insurance v. ManzioneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Twin City Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Merchants Mutual Insurance Group v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- North American Foreign Trading Corp. v. Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Government Employees Insurance v. PaganoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. VidaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.