Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dataurus Denzell Gotcher v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided June 10, 2014No. 06-13-00177-CRPublished

1DissentBailey C. Moseley, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

I concur with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court erred in its preclusion of Tacka Gotcher’s testimony that she had observed Janie Lynn Ragsdale, the complainant, performing fellatio on the defendant only two days before the incident giving rise to the charges against Gotcher. The issue of consent was clearly before the trial court at that time. My dissent deals, rather, with the result of the harm analysis employed. I believe that Gotcher’s substantial rights were adversely impacted, and I also believe that the absence of this testimony had a great impact on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Billodeau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Hammer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API