Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Bloch

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Multnomah: E. D. Shattuck, Judge. Appeal from an order denying an application to offset a judgment. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Wolverton

The facts attending this case are briefly stated as follows: On February 23, 1897, a judgment was given and rendered in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon, for Multnomah *318County, in favor of Adelaide Bloch, who was plaintiff therer in, and against F. L. Richmond and F. A. E. Starr, who were defendants therein, for the sum of $4,001.25, and $15.50 costs and disbursements, which was reduced by partial payments to $3,355.03. On June 30, 1897, F. L. Richmond, one of the plaintiffs herein, recovered a Judgment against the defendants Adelaide Bloch, M. M. Bloch, and F. Bloch for the sum of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peoria & Oquawka Rail Road v. NeillIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Phelps v. ReederIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Snyder v. SpurrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1866
  4. Gordon v. SwiftIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Atkins v. ChurchillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hammer v. Campbell Gas Burner Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API