Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Brown

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1989No. 88AP-212PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Young, Judge.

This matter is before the court upon the appeal of Sherrod Brown, Ohio Secretary of State, from the trial court’s decision that a quo warranto proceeding or a hearing brought pursuant to R.C. 3.07 must be conducted before the forfeiture of public office, as outlined in R.C. 2961.01, may be invoked.

The appellee, Martin J. Hughes, was appointed March 1, 1986, as a member of the Board of Elections of Cuyahoga County. The appellee’s term on the board of elections is scheduled to expire on February 28, 1990. On November 13, 1987, the appellee was convicted of a felony under the laws…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. 2DP Blanding, LLC v. PalmerUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Adamson v. VarnauOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State ex rel. Reynolds v. NixOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  4. State ex rel. Daniels v. HinksonOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. State ex rel. Reynolds v. NixOhio Supreme Court · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API