Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Hon. marner/haniffa

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2026No. CR-24-0300-PRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA STATE OF ARIZONA, Petitioner, v. HON. JAMES E. MARNER, JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA, Respondent Judge, and HANEES MOHAMED HANIFFA, Real Party in Interest. No. CR-24-0300-PR Filed January 30, 2026 Special Action from the Superior Court in Pima County The Honorable James E. Marner, Judge No. CR20240488-001 REVERSED AND REMANDED Opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division Two

258 Ariz. 512

(App. 2024) VACATED COUNSEL: Laura Conover, Pima County Attorney, Tai Summers (argued), J. William Brammer, Jr.,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. United States v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API