Grossini v. Perazzo
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The action was brought to- obtain an accounting between partners. The creditors of the partnership filed a complaint of intervention therein, for the purpose of reaching the proceeds resulting from a fraudulent sale of the firm property by the defendant. Judgment was rendered in favor of the intervenors. The further facts are sufficiently stated in the. opinion of the court,
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
1. The appellant contends that the demurrer to the complaint of intervention, on the ground of misjoinder of causes of action, should have been sustained. The plaintiff brought his action to obtain a decree that Perazzo account for the value of all the property of the alleged copartnership, etc. As creditors of the partnership, the intervenors were interested in the subject matter of the suit adversely to Perazzo, if, as alleged, he had fraudulently caused the partnership property to be dissipated, or placed beyond the reach of the partnership creditors, by a sale of it, the proceeds of which…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Nelson v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Rosenbaum v. KershawAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888