Legal Opinion

Cribbs v. Walker

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 28, 1905Published

Cross appeals from Pulaski Chancery Court. William H. and Cullen C. Walker, grandsons of Cullen G. Cribbs, deceased, brought suit against Katie G. Cribbs, in her own right and as trustee and administratrix of the estate of Cullen G. Cribbs and Lee F. Tirrill and Lina Davis, who, with plaintiffs, were the only heirs at law of Cullen G. Cribbs.

Read the full summary

Cross appeals from Pulaski Chancery Court. William H. and Cullen C. Walker, grandsons of Cullen G. Cribbs, deceased, brought suit against Katie G. Cribbs, in her own right and as trustee and administratrix of the estate of Cullen G. Cribbs and Lee F. Tirrill and Lina Davis, who, with plaintiffs, were the only heirs at law of Cullen G. Cribbs. The complaint attacked the validity of a certain deed of trusb which will be here set forth: “This deed of trust made and executed by and between Cullen G. Cribbs, party of the first part, and Katie G. Cribbs, his wife, party of the second part, on this,…

1Opinion

on rehearing.

McCulloch, J.

Mrs. Lina Davis, one of the appellants and one of the defendants below, on petition for rehearing, calls attention to the failure of the court to consider the questions raised by her cross . complaint, which was dismissed by the chancellor for want of equity.

The case was determined here upon the theory that the cross complaint was withdrawn before the trial below, but on further inspection of the -record we find that the same was renewed, as claimed in the petition for rehearing. We therefore proceed to determine the issues therein raised.

The renewal of the cross…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pembroke v. LoganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API