Legal Opinion

State v. Dixon

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 2016No. 15AP-1037PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Dixon,

2016-Ohio-955.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 15AP-1037 v. : (C.P.C. No. 97CR-781) Marvell E. Dixon, : (ACCELERATED CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellant. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on March 10, 2016 On brief: Ron O'Brien, Prosecuting Attorney, and Sheryl L. Prichard, for appellee. On brief: Marvell E. Dixon, pro se. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas HORTON, J. {¶ 1} Marvell E. Dixon ("appellant") appeals from the denial of his "Motion for Re-Sentencing." For the reasons set forth below,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. GondorOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. State v. DixonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. White v. Warden, Pickaway Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
  4. White v. Warden, Pickaway Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
  5. White v. Warden, Pickaway Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API