Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Board of Review

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 20, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Faville, C. J. —

I. Appellants contend that appellee could not raise the questions involved in this case by appeal from the board of review to the district court. No question of omitted property is involved, nor it is claimed there was any error m the valuation fixed on appellee s property; and the sole question is as to the correct amount of the tax and the manner of ascertaining the same.

We have recently had occasion to review and pass upon the identical question raised by appellant as to whether appeal is a proper remedy in such a case, and collected and reviewed the authorities' in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aberdeen Bank v. Chehalis CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Merchants' Nat. Bank of Richmond v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Griswold Land & Credit Co. v. County of CalhounSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. First National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Assessment of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Iowa National Bank v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Nelson v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF SIOUX CITY, IOWACourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. First National Bank v. Board of Review of NewtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. State v. First National Bank of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API