Legal Opinion

Claims of Whitehair v. Kansas Flour Mills Corp.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1929No. 28,727PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an arbitration proceeding. Appellants complain of the order of the court setting aside the award on account of misbehavior of the arbitrators, and the appellee has a cross appeal from the order of the court referring the matter back to the same arbitrators for rehearing.

A fuller statement will better disclose the questions here presented. The Kansas Flour Mills Corporation operates a flour mill at Enterprise, where it has a dam across the Smoky Hill river to impound a body of water used for power purposes. Owners of farm land in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stefano Berizzi Co. v. KrauszNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Lantry Contracting Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Jackson v. RoaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  4. Thompson v. BarberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Jessup & Moore Paper Co. v. A. S. Reed & Brother Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O & G/O'Connell Joint Venture v. Chase Family Ltd. Partnership No. 3Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Vincent Builders, Inc. v. American Application Systems, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  3. Broughton v. Kansas Flour Mills Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API