Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Dayton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 28, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

These are appeals by a son from two decrees made by a single justice affirming the action of the Probate Court. They come before us without findings of fact or a report of the evidence. -

The first decree as modified and affirmed by the single justice grants a license to the guardian of an insane person to sell at private sale to one who is a part owner of the fee, the ward’s right of dower and homestead, “ which have never been set out ” to her, for the sum of $706.56, “ as it is necessary that her said interest be released or sold for her maintenance.” The other decree authorizes the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lawless v. ReaganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. Pierce v. GouldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Pattee v. StetsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Leyland v. LeylandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  5. Cowdrey v. CowdreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ensign v. FaxonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Hale v. BlanchardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Creed v. KeyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. In Re Guardianship of HoffmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Fredrick v. KoetterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API