Legal Opinion

Smith v. Florida Power & Light Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 1, 1994No. 93-2103PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

632 So.2d 696 (1994)

Patrian SMITH, etc., et al., Petitioners,

v.

FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, etc., Respondent.

No. 93-2103.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 1, 1994.

Don Russo, Russo Talisman & Moylan and Patrice Talisman, Coconut Grove, for petitioners.

Aimee Stein, Hicks Anderson & Blum and Gary A. Magnarini and Mark Hicks, Miami, for respondent.

Before NESBITT, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.

JORGENSON, Judge.

This case presents a question of first impression in Florida — whether an attorney's selection of documents which by themselves would not be cloaked with the work product…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
  4. Dodson v. PersellSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  5. Surf Drugs, Inc. v. VermetteSupreme Court of Florida · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Northup v. AckenSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. Hall-EdwardsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  3. Hunter's Ridge Golf Co. v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
  4. Gardner v. Manor Care of Boca Raton, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Melinda Butler v. Sarah HarterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API