Legal Opinion
Triad Financial Corp. v. Weathington (In Re Weathington)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 20, 2000No. 00-8008PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RHODES, Chief Judge.
In this case, a secured creditor appeals the bankruptcy court’s determination that the appropriate value of a vehicle for purposes of redemption pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 722 is the liquidation value. The Creditor argues that the appropriate value should be the replacement value, as defined by the Supreme Court in Associates Commercial Corp. v. Rash, 520 U.S. 953, 117 S.Ct. 1879, 138 L.Ed.2d 148 (1997). The Panel concludes that Rash is distinguishable because that case involved the proper valuation in the context of a Chapter 13 plan confirmation. The use of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Associates Commercial Corp. v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,948 in Re Kenneth L. Isaacman, Debtor. J.E. Nicholson, Jr. v. Kenneth L. IsaacmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re Thomas Howard Bell and Margaret Louise Bell, Debtors. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Thomas Howard Bell and Margaret Louise BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. SpiveyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- In Re PodnarUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2003
- In Re TripplettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- In Re ArdUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 2002
- In Re BallardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.