Legal Opinion

Cabot Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 9, 1964No. 6206PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff-appellant came into existence as the result of a single transaction merging prior corporations. It would fractionate that single transaction into taxable and non-taxable parts in order to minimize the stock issue and transfer taxes imposed by §§ 4301 and 4321 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. The fact that the end might have been accomplished by two separate transactions only one of which would subject the plaintiff-appellant to tax is beside the point. See Founders General Corp. v. Hoey, 300 U.S. 268, at page 275, 57 S.Ct. 457 at page 460, 81 L.Ed. 639 (1937), in which the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Founders General Corp. v. HoeySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Impala Trading Corp. v. Hawthorne Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Columbia Gas of Maryland, Inc. And Cumberland and Allegheny Gas Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  2. Wiseman v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1966
  3. Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc., and the Manufacturers Light and Heat Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  4. Columbia Gas of Maryland, Inc. And Cumberland and Allegheny Gas Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  5. Columbia Gas of Maryland, Inc. And Cumberland and Allegheny Gas Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API