Cullacott v. Cash Gold & Silver Mining Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from, District Court of Boulder County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, C. J.
The facts of this case are novel. Prior to the acquisition of the government title it is not an unusual circumstance for a mining claim to be. entered upon and appropriated by strangers to the location.
A failure on the part of the original locators to comply with any of the specific requirements of the law relating to the location of mining claims, or failure to perform annual labor within the time and of the value required, after location, is often made the pretext for jumping or relocating claims. But after the miner has complied with all requirements of state and federal statutes, has…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Daniel Boardman and Others, in Error v. The Lessees of Reed and Ford, M'call and Others, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
3Cited by14 opinions
- Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
- Whiteman v. MattsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Kretschmer v. HardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
- Risch v. WisemanOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Snowmass Land Co. v. Two Creeks Homeowner's Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.