Legal Opinion

Harp v. Abrahamson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 15, 1957No. 49059PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHays, J.

Action in mandamus wherein the duty of the treasurer of the state of Iowa, under section 312.3(2), Code of 1954, is involved. By agreement and as provided by rule 105, Rules of Civil Procedure, the following law point was submitted to the trial court: Whether, in the apportionment of the road use-tax fund as directed in section 312.3(2) (all subsequent references to statutes refer to Code of 1954 unless otherwise stated), the treasurer of state is required to use, as a basis therefor, the population of a city or town as appears in the 1950 census, as certified by the secretary of state, or,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buckley v. DeeganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  2. Broyles v. Mahaska CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. State ex rel. Hilfiker v. SeatonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. In re Statement of Consent by Certain Voters of AtlanticSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. Bankers Building Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  2. City of Bridgeton v. GilstrapSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  3. State ex rel. City of Casper v. MorganWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Kopp v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Kopp v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API