Legal Opinion

Contreras v. Munoz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 10, 1996No. Nos. 94-1663, 94-1716Published

1Per curiam

We find that the trial court properly denied the defendants’, Metropolitan Dade County [the county] and Jorge and Celina Contreras [the landowners], motions for directed verdict. We affirm.

These defendants, along with the motorist involved, were sued when a pedestrian, who was crossing the street at a signalized intersection, was struck and killed by a motorist. The plaintiffs alleged that these defendants, the county and the landowners of the property adjacent to the crosswalk, contributed to the cause of the accident by negligently allowing trees and shrubbery to protrude over the sidewalk…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Idy Corp. v. FentonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API