King v. Watts
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from tlie Fourteenth Judicial District Court, parish of Ouachita.
1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.
This is au action to enjoin and annul a judgment in the case of J. T. Watts, Administrator, v. J. W. T. Richardson, G. King and W. H. Gale, on a promissory note made by said defendants, on the following grounds:
First — Plaintiff did not appear, was not represented, and did not authorize an attorney to represent him in said suit.
Second — Said judgment was not rendered by default regularly taken or on final proof made.
Third — lie neither confessed nor authorized any one to confess said judgment.
Fourth — Admitting he had an attorney, such attorney was not authorized to confess judgment or…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Barrow v. BarrowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Bloom v. MundyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Interdiction of LepineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926