In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-512016
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Presiding Judge.
In this opinion, we hold that the juvenile court neither violated the ex post facto clauses of the federal or state constitutions nor abused its statutory discretion when it committed a juvenile to a locked facility of the Arizona Department of Juvenile Corrections (“ADJC”) for a term that exceeded the term recommended in the ADJC Guidelines and Classification Matrix.
I. BACKGROUND
On August 9, 1995, the State filed a delinquency petition alleging that the juvenile committed child molestation. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the juvenile admitted that he had…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- State v. NobleArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MarquezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Matter of Appeal in Maricopa Cty., No. Jv-510312Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- State v. RoweArizona Supreme Court · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re M.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- In Re Niky R.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- In Re Themika M.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- In re J.G.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Carl v. Long v. C. Tony Wright, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.