Legal Opinion

Watson v. Alta Investment Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1910No. Civ. No. 773Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Geo. H. Buck, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal by the intervener, Western Fuel Company, from the judgment in favor of the defendants, and from an order denying its motion for a new trial, and is taken on the same transcript as case No. 701, ante, p. 560, [108 Pac. 48], bearing the same title, which we have this day decided. It grows out of the same transaction, and is argued in and submitted upon the same briefs.

The intervener furnished materials to Watson Bros., the plaintiff’s assignors, to be used in the construction of the building giving rise to the controversy in said case No. 701; and long after the destruction of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Watson v. Alta Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API