Legal Opinion
Rushing v. Travelers Insurance Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 2, 1956No. 8456PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLADNEY, Judge.
John M. Rushing, a resident of Natch-itoches Parish, Louisiana, has instituted this action for workmen’s compensation, and from a judgment rejecting his demands he has appealed.
The relief sought by plaintiff encompasses iniuries received in two separate acci*299dents, the first of which occurred in the State of Arkansas and the second in Webster Parish, Louisiana, it being alleged that the second injury aggravated the pre-exist-ing one. Each of said accidents is.alleged to fall within the purview of workmen’s compensation coverage, and in each instance the respondent, Travelers…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Boyle Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Burton v. LesterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Savoy Grill, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936
- Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. BullockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
3Cited by3 opinions
- Woodham v. Travelers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Warren v. Dixon and Christopher CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961