Legal Opinion

Hughes v. State

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 30, 1984No. Writ No. K 2224Published

1Opinion of the Court

CIACCIO, Judge.

Upon application of defendant we issued a writ of certiorari so that we could review the record of the proceedings in the district court concerning two post-conviction motions filed by defendant. Defendant’s first motion combined a request for an out-of-time appeal and an application for a writ of habeas corpus wherein he argued that the evidence presented at his trial was insufficient to sustain his conviction. Defendant’s second motion again raised the issue of sufficiency of the evidence, and raised a plea of self-defense. The district court summarily denied both motions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MarcellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  3. State ex rel. LaFleur v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API