People ex rel. Kilgallon v. Nuhn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the relator from an order of the Supreme Court, made at Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Queens on the 23d day of November, 1915, denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus.
1Per curiam
We think that the disposition made by the Special Term was right. The opinion of Maddox, J., who presided in that court, renders any discussion by us unnecessary. The opinion as printed in the record and as published (92 Misc. Rep. 312) states that Browning, King & Co. v. Chamberlain (150 App. Div. 392) was affirmed in 210 New York, 270. This was probably a slip of the pen. That ease was reversed. (See 210 N. Y. 270, 274.) The order of the Special Term is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Jenks, P .J., Thomas, Carr, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred. Order affirmed, with ten…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Browning, King Co. v. . ChamberlainNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- People ex rel. Luke v. NuhnNew York Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by3 opinions
- Witt-Stuart Realty Corp. v. MantellAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1935
- Young v. LucasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Tauszig v. KantorNew York Supreme Court · 1921