Legal Opinion

Pappadakis v. Netherlands Fire & Life Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1926No. 19408. Department TwoPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action is based upon fire insurance policies issued by the defendants. The cause was tried to the court without a jury and resulted in findings of fact, conclusions of law and a judgment sustaining a recovery in the sum of $600. From this judgment, the defendants appeal.

The respondent, under the name of the Athenian Confectionery & Bakery, operated a bakery in Pike Place Market, in the city of Seattle. Upon his fixtures and stock of supplies, the appellants had issued fire insurance policies, each of which provided “against all direct loss or damage by fire.” In Pike Place Market, there…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Way v. Abington Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Cannon v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Fitzgerald v. German-American Insurance, New York County Courts1899

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. James E. Torina Fine Homes, Inc. v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Mode, Ltd. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  4. City of New York Ins. Co. v. GugenheimCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Coryell v. Old Colony InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API