Legal Opinion

Capps v. Ratcliff

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1959No. 6539PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGHEE, Justice.

The plaintiff and defendant entered into an oral contract whereby the plaintiff was to pull the casing in an existing water well and to deepen it with an eight inch hole until stopped by the defendant.

The plaintiff claimed that he had been stopped in his work and that under the contract the defendant was indebted to him for drilling 233 feet as follows: Five feet at $2 per foot, 100 feet at $2.50 per foot, 100 feet at $3 per foot, and 28 feet at $3.50 per foot. The plaintiff further claimed that with the knowledge and acquiescence of the defendant he performed additional…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leonard v. GreenleafNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tabet Lumber Company v. ChalamidasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Johnson v. Keesing (In Re Antweil)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API