Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided April 12, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable John Paul Verkamp State Representative 1405 W. Center Street Greenwood, AR 72936-3405

Dear Representative Verkamp:

You have presented the following questions for my opinion:(1) Is it proper for the Arkansas Assessment Coordination Department to set the estimated value of natural gas produced at the well head?(2) In light of the volatility of gas prices, is it proper for the Arkansas Assessment Coordination Department to establish the value of natural gas produced at the well head by using a one-year average price of natural gas produced and sold at the well head to determine the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ozark Gas Pipeline Corp. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Tuthill v. Arkansas County Equalization BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Ark. Publ. Service Comm.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  4. Jim Paws v. EQUALIZATION BD. OF GARLANDSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Cook v. Surplus Trading CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API