Legal Opinion

Dempsey Oil v. Hussey Whelan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 2, 1923No. 2790PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the facts as above). The court concluded, and (hat conclusion is assailed by appellant, that under the facts proven the appellant should be held liable to pay for the gas used in drilling the well the distance between 2,340 and 2,500 feet, because of the express promise at the time of the appellant to pay for the gas so used. The appellant- urges that even if the Dempsey Oil Company, Limited, promised to pay for the gas so hsed, it would be without consideration and not legally binding. As found by the court the appellant promised to pay for the gas used in drilling the well…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tripplett v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Vogt v. DorseyTexas Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Charles F. Curry and Company v. HedrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  2. Cawley v. Dixie Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API