Legal Opinion

Schulman v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernstein, J.

The determination of these cross-motions for summary judgment depends entirely upon the interpretation of subdivision 7 of section 384-13.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York. The action is for commissions claimed to have been earned by the plaintiff, a real estate broker, for procuring some clients who bid in at auction a leasehold interest in real estate owned by the city. The clients signed the memorandum of sale and paid the city the .initial deposit required by the terms of sale, but eventually failed to enter into the lease or to assume its obligations. Upon the refusal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gilder v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Matter of United Artists Corp. v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Saum v. Capital Realty Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Matter of Gunther's Sons v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. American Mercantile Corp. v. SpielbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Otero v. New York City Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. Otero v. New York City Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Henson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Sosebee v. BoswellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  5. Sosebee v. BoswellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API