Legal Opinion
Reed v. Hickey
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 29, 1941No. Civil Action No. 1294PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
As to all the averments essential' to establishing the plaintiff’s cause of action, the answer of the Secretary of Banking either admits them or answers that they are “neither admitted nor denied, but proof thereof is demanded if material.” This is an insufficient denial under the Rules. 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. Of course, the Secretary of Banking could' not and would not say that he was without information sufficient to form a belief as to such matters of public knowledge as the closing of the Sixth National Bank (of which he was a stockholder), the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ericson v. SlomerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mahanor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
- Andromidas v. Theisen Bros.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1950
- Hines v. Ward Baking Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- Mesirow v. DugganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- Eleanor G. Biggs v. Public Service Coordinated Transport v. Robert Washington Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.