Radovsky v. Sperling
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Contract on a poor debtor’s recognizance against Abrabatn Sperling as principal and Israel Ziman as surety. Writ in the Second District Court of Bristol dated December 14,1903. On appeal to tbe Superior Court there was a finding for the defendants, and exceptions taken by the plaintiff were sustained by this court in the decision referred to in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Contract on a poor debtor’s recognizance against Abrabatn Sperling as principal and Israel Ziman as surety. Writ in the Second District Court of Bristol dated December 14,1903. On appeal to tbe Superior Court there was a finding for the defendants, and exceptions taken by the plaintiff were sustained by this court in the decision referred to in the opinion. The case came on again for trial in the Superior Court before White, J., who made the following memorandum of findings: “ The counsel for the parties agreed and I find that the facts herein are the same as stated by Mr. Justice Hammond in…
1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.
This is an action on a poor debtor’s recognizance, and the facts are exactly the same as stated in the report of this case in 187 Mass. 202, except that it now appears that the only charge filed by the judgment creditor in the Second District Court of Bristol was that mentioned in the first clause of R. L. c. 168, § 17, and that the examination of the judgment debtor, which was begun in that court upon his application to take the oath for the relief of poor debtors, was upon this charge only. The single question in the case therefore is whether the judge of that court, upon the default of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Damon v. CarrolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Morgan v. CurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Mount Washington Glass Works v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Hills v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Fuller v. MeehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sturman v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919