United States v. Shawn Dixon
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARCUS, Circuit Judge:
Shawn Dixon appeals his sentence at the bottom of the guideline range for being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). On appeal; Dixon argues that the sentencing court erred in determining that his Florida conviction for domestic battery by strangulation qualified as a “crime of violence” because the statute criminalizes non-violent touching-that creates a de min-imis risk of great bodily harm. After-thorough review, we affirm.
The relevant facts are these. Dixon pleaded guilty to one count of being a felon in possession…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Eddy Wilmer Vail-BailonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Jason Dennis McGuireCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- James Steiner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Marlon EasonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Jerome Curtis StancilCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Christian RosadoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Christian RosadoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.