Legal Opinion

Layton v. S. H. Bolinger Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 7, 1976No. 12960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOLIN, Judge.

Plaintiff sued defendants for workmen’s compensation benefits, penalties and attorney fees due him for injuries he allegedly received while employed as a log cutter for S. H. Bolinger Company. Anthony Forest Products Company concedes that if there is liability Anthony has agreed to pay all compensation claims incurred by Bolinger. Plaintiff claims he was rendered totally and permanently disabled as result of accidental injuries received during the course and scope of his employment. For written reasons the trial court rejected plaintiff’s demands and he appeals. We affirm.

In his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guillory v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  2. King v. Employers Mutual of WausauLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Guillory v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Layton v. S. H. Bolinger Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API