Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Estate of Hjersted

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 1, 2008No. 93,470Published

1ConcurrenceDavis, J.

I concur in the majority’s decision to reverse the Court of Appeals’ decision which affirmed the district court’s determination of MRI value and reversed in part and remanded the case to the district court for determination of the valuation of the 96% Hjersted Family Limited Partnership (HFLP) interest as of March 1,2000. The majority decision correctly points out the legal error of the Court of Appeals in its rejection of Korschot’s additional discounts and the effect such a rejection had of “effectively eliminat[ing] the only evidence in the record on the value of the transferred 96%…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arnaud v. Stockgrowers State Bank of AshlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  2. In re the Estate of HjerstedCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API