Legal Opinion

Garlasco v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.

Upon the facts clearly and fully established by the plaintiff (not excepted to as found in the decision save in one instance) the relief granted was fully justified under the principles enunciated in our decision in Kossoff v. Wald (241 App. Div. 483).

It is urged, however, that a judgment of foreclosure and sale, entered before the commencement of this action, to which the plaintiff herein was a party defendant, is res adjudicóla as to plaintiff’s alleged cause of action. The facts upon which this action is predicated it is asserted might have been pleaded as a defense in the foreclosure…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Byrnes v. OwenNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Kossoff v. WaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  3. Ardolino v. ReinhardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. LiMauroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Vinlis Construction Co. v. RoreckNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Lawrence Avenue Group, USA, Inc. v. ParnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Matter of Dixon v. RichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API