Legal Opinion
People v. Frederighi
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1916No. Docket No. 132PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Exceptions before sentence from Berrien; Bridgman, J. Cesare Frederighi was convicted of selling fruit in violation of Act No. 207, Pub. Acts 1913.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
The respondent is charged with a violation of section 5 of Act No. 207, Pub. Acts 1913 (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 15369). This act is entitled—
“An act to prevent fraud and deception in the sale of Michigan-grown fresh fruits and vegetables, and to provide penalties for violations of this act.”
The act contains six sections. The first five sections regulate the packing and sale of fruit, and define what acts shall constitute a violation of the law. The complaint upon which this prosecution is based alleges facts which are within section 5, which is in terms as follows:
“No person shall sell or offer,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. FitzgeraldMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. LennoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. VillanoMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. WeissMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. JaboroMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Erhard v. Boone State Bank of BooneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- People v. VillanoMichigan Supreme Court · 1963