Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ida Mary Lewis v. University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Book Center

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 9, 1984No. 83-5052Published

1DissentAdams, Circuit Judge

This appeal starkly demonstrates the need to reaffirm the fundamental policy behind statutory protections against employment discrimination.

In the case before us, the trial court misconceived the substantive rights protected by the antidiscrimination statutes, as well as the evidentiary burden — both intermediate and ultimate — allocated to a plaintiff by McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973). Thus while I agree with the majority that all three statutory claims in this proceeding are governed by the same legal standards, and while I also agree…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API