Legal Opinion

State v. Dixon

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 24, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

933 A.2d 978 (2007)

396 N.J. Super. 329

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Michele DIXON, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted October 1, 2007.

Decided October 24, 2007.

Yvonne Smith Segars, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Patrick T. Cronin, Designated Counsel, on the brief).

Bruce J. Kaplan, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Simon Louis Rosenbach, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges S.L. REISNER, GILROY and BAXTER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

S.L. REISNER, J.A.D.

Defendant…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State v. DiFriscoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. State v. ReddishSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  4. Andersen v. Exxon Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  5. State v. HockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of New Jersey v. Daniel A. BorjasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
  2. State v. Jodi D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
  3. State v. PomianekNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
  4. RATARSHA WILLIS VS. CARL WALKER (L-0634-15, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API