Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Smith v. Henderson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided September 25, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALKER, Presiding Judge.

In their habeas corpus petition, Victor Smith and *595Thomas Coleman say that their 1959 convictions for rape and sentences to 25 years’ imprisonment were void because they were arrested without a warrant, they were not represented by counsel at interrogation and were threatened by officers, they were not represented by counsel at the prehminary hearing, they were convicted on circumstantial evidence, and the Legislature was improperly apportioned at the time of their convictions.

Counsel was appointed to represent the petitioners in this proceeding. The respondent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Thompson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State Ex Rel. Weston v. HendersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State ex rel. Fralix v. BomarTennessee Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. George Hardin v. Jim Morrow, WardenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
  2. Robert M. Winters v. Jim Morrow, WardenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API