Legal Opinion

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports

Decided December 24, 1991No. 91-301Published

1Opinion of the Court

TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL State of California DANIEL E. LUNGREN Attorney General ______________________________________ OPINION : : No. 91-301 of : : DECEMBER 24, 1991 DANIEL E. LUNGREN : Attorney General : : RONALD M. WEISKOPF : Deputy Attorney General : : ______________________________________________________________________________ THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD has requested an opinion on the following question: Does a good-faith misunderstanding of the law or a good-faith belief that one's actions did not violate the law, even though objectively…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. PomponioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API